I agree with weirdstop, and also think that the original one is (far more) better than the rendered one... IMHO: - In the rendered one, the solar reflection on the sea is exploding, and thus suppressing many of the other elements... - The contrast and the brightness of the original one gives the eye the opportunity of seeing much more detail and texture...thus, much more info about the scene. This is especially true for the whole bulk of the ice globe, and seeing it as a whole seems to be more valuable... - The sole possible advantage of the rendered one is the blue duotone which suits the presence of ice... Conclusion: - The original one is a beautiful photo with its every aspect. Especially the subject matter is impressive, and I think you've succeeded in capturing its essence... - You're one lucky person for being able to see such natural wonders... :) Regards...