Believable3D opened this issue on Aug 15, 2014 · 24 posts
aRtBee posted Sun, 17 August 2014 at 11:47 AM
@pumeco
sorry to disappoint you, but having been part of the gang who survived Poser 5 it's pretty hard to get me frustrated by any recent development. I'm grateful to stewer and his (very small) gang for all the work done, from my software development background I do know what it takes.
I'm just having fun with it, it's the Fiat amongst 3D tools, and I'm not part of the gang who insists on turning the Fiat into a Ferrari for the price of a Vespa. Which doesn't stop me from understanding all its limitations, and from really mastering the features it actually offers.
And it's an artists tool to me, supporting a very wide range of styles, and enabling me to create reasonable and believable results in the photoreal arena too. For other goals I need (and use) other tools. Octane and Photoshop are my friends as well. Some people want to understand Poser from a Physics point of view. I''ve started to understand Poser from an artist''s point of view. Like: what are GC, IDL and Scatter doing to image depth and object shape presentation, and how do they interact?
join the club.
- - - - -
Usually I'm wrong. But to be effective and efficient, I don't need to be correct or accurate.
visit www.aRtBeeWeb.nl (works) or Missing Manuals (tutorials & reviews) - both need an update though