Quote - DAZ3d is a content company that make content for only its application ,DAZ studio, so for me, today, it is not onlya content company. A company that sells Bryce, Carrara, DAz studio, hexagon... it is a software company, and this is not a bad thing, but it is the real thing.

I did not say they don't sell software, technically Content is software, non-content Software is not their primary source of revenue, after all DAZ Studio costs how much? Are you sure it is only for DAZ Studio? Not Poser, not Carrara, not 3DS MAX, not Maya, not Lightwave, not C4D, not Vue, etc.

Quote - About DSON, really you are saying that a software company has to change its own application because one of its competitors make a figure that is not compatible with their software, really?, that would mean than SM would be indirectly controlled by DAZ3d

No it means it is answering to its customers' (to include yours) desires. If being able to use DAZ 3D Figures means that Poser is controlled by DAZ 3D then they have been controlled by DAZ3D since Poser 4, so much so that Poser 5 had Victoria and Michael on the box. As for SM changing its software to support a DAZ 3D release, they have done it many times before. > Quote - About DSON is or not a Bungler attempt, well just use it  and tell me.

I have done much more than just use it.  > Quote - Dson is a customer answer, but not becase SM refused to listen, but because DAZ3d notice that their decision to put aside Poser with genesis, would not have control of the entire market, as they surely wanted,  but rather lose part of it, the part of Poser user that want and love use Poser and didn't want to use DAz studio.

You are stating a poorly formed personal opinion as fact, and you are not even close to correct.