Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Which would you rather have?

EClark1894 opened this issue on Sep 24, 2014 · 84 posts


wolf359 posted Tue, 30 September 2014 at 8:46 AM

"Better solutions:

1.  DAZ hires better software programmers and makes DSON work seamlessly as an add-on.  After all, that was the whole purpose of the add-on framework was to enable niche capabilites such as this to the core system. "

Alternatively SMITH MICRO hires better figure creators and make usable native poser figures that are not utter crap !!

after all the whole purpose of adding support for weight mapping and pixar SubD etc was ostensibly for the creation of better poser native figures.

"Of course, this would require DAZ to do the heavy lifting on their figures, and what are the odds of that?"

Daz did sort of do some "heavy lifting" in the creation the genesis figures for their figure program that many people here seem to Covet so Desperately for poser

Here is a Radical Idea: ,
how about poser users demand that SMITH MICRO undertake some 'heavy lifting" on their native poser figures??, ...BAH!!  what are the odds of that?"



My website

YouTube Channel