The only issue I have is the lack of full disclosure. Telling people that the g-thing 'Works In Poser' is misleading. Because the new and the virgin (and far too many with some experience) are going to be mentally adding 'just like it does in DS' to the end of that statement, because the initial assertion suggests it. Which is a blatant untruth. If it's explained fully, no problem. But how often is it? How many times do we have to get on this merry go round when someone tries the g-thing? My personal view is if you have to slap two or more qualifiers onto something working or being compatible with something else, then it doesn't and it's not. You might be able to kludge -some- function out of it (which a lot of people have), but you do not get =full= function (and if this is no longer the case, please provide references to both stills and animation proving it). And that should be stated plainly. All we need is a sticky up at the top of the page, listing all the steps you need to take and all the urls of the assorted scripts needed to obtain specific functions, and someone take the time to write it up as a technical document, removing any and all attempts at humor and marketshare grabbing from it. Information sans opinion. From any side. Then its just point at the top and say 'ask if you have some issue not addressed there'.