True art, for me, doesn't need to explain itself. It has a different meaning to everyone that sees it. Pollock stopped naming his paintings because he was sick of people looking for the meaning attached to it. His goal was for the viewer to experience the work as a whole, to let it speak to them, instead of trying to pick out one aspect over another. Every piece, every grain of sand or piece of glass or drop of paint in it had its own life and story to tell, but no one ever really grasped it. His popularity for his work just drove him more insane and further into depression and alcoholism, to the point where he stopped painting all together. 

I've never been a fan of superheroes. They represent too many problems with modern society for my liking, so I don't see them or their stories as art. I've always been drawn to the anti-hero concept - the perceived villain that winds up saving you from the 'good' and the 'bad' alike. 'Evil' after all, is just a point of view.