kljpmsd opened this issue on Mar 09, 2015 · 254 posts
wolf359 posted Tue, 17 March 2015 at 9:48 AM
Hi
I am reposting part of a post I made In July 2014 in response
to the Claim of poser Merchants having Lost "Millions"to piracy.
This is not a personal Attack on anyone just an Observation
of the Objective,Observable reality
As a merchant selling Digital products here at Renderosity
I have long since accepted the reality that
This is not a viable way(IMHO) to make a primary living which is why I still rely on custom character animation,3D motion graphics and good old fashioned 2D graphic design for print.
I recently read a very interesting book
on my Kindle called "The second Machine Age"
This book was very blunt in clarifying the reality of selling "Data sets" (ie digital products) as a business model.
In Short our business model CANNOT be compared to a craftsman selling, Maintaining an inventory of, and shipping&delivering even the most generic physical product that he created/manufactured.
This because our only real cost is the purchase price of whatever development software we used and our own subjective opinion of what our expert labor costs to produce ONE original copy.
After that, the "shelf life" & dollar value of your product is severely limited by several factors
,not the least of which, is the ability by you, ( and others),to instantly "manufacture" store and distribute unlimited copies at a cost of ZERO dollars.
As Merchants of digital poser content Our "loss" thus is not literal as in the case of the real life open sea "pirate" stealing a physical shipping container of Apple Ipads at gun point,that Apple Paid to develope &manufacture, and thereafter can NEVER be sold (By Apple) for a profit.
As they have been "Pirated"or physically removed from apple's inventory in a Zero Sum Fashion.
Our "loss"can only be a theoretical estimate of what all those unlimited copies would have sold for ,at our retail price.
Alas IMHO our scenario then becomes a sort of "Schrödinger's cat" paradox wrapped in endlessly debatable semantics.
whereby I am enjoying the benefit of being able to "manufacture" one million copies of my $10 dollar python script at a cost of Zero.....
while simultaneously asserting I have suffered a $10 Million Dollar "loss" when disparate users worldwide collectively create one million copies of this same script via unauthorized digital downloads on torrent.
" Most network providers hide behind the DMCA and pull the content, but they do not unplug accounts or pull the blogs that are used entirely for piracy (many Ive found our stuff on, there are also links to cracks of Adobe products, etc)".
On the matter of ISP unplugging accounts or inserting themselves into disputes over ownership of content being
hosted or transferred on their networks.
I personally know several individuals who partake in the Cottage industry of selling "bootlegged" DVD's& music in low income urban areas to the non tech savvy populations there.
One Such person has Verizon as his ISP.
He recently received a notice,from verizon, that Paramount studios(IIRC)
Accused him of Downloading one of their movies or TV shows
Via Torrent.
Verizon inc Made this Man "sign " a digital Statement
Promising to "desist" from this activity
and he Did so.
Shortly thereafter he was Accused of Downloading more
Bootlegged movies .etc.
This time Verizon sent him a policy Statement indicating
that in the( frankly unlikely) Event of a Lawsuit by Paramount etc
they ( Verizon), would share his personal information with
the Claimants if the claimants lawyer requested it.
No Threat of shutting off his service was ever Made by Verizon
This shows us that ISP's are in the Primary business of COLLECTING MONTHLY Service fees from their subscribers.
Not Deleting Consumer accounts (in this highly competitive market) over DVD/Bluray rips of "Star Trek" or last seasons TV episodes of "the Good Wife" or "Two broke Girls".
Paramount is a Multi-billion Dollar Corporation
they Could Afford the cost of legally pursuing those who
distribute their movies & TV shows.
But they almost Never Go after individuals
and even in the case of State sponsored "piracy"
( such as China,North Korea etc,) they defer to the Buffoons in
Washington DC to Decide if it is in their Political interest to
take any action.
So what real options does a pose/Daz merchant have over
stopping distribution of his
purpose built $$ small market$$ digital goods???...not many IMHO.