grichter opened this issue on Apr 03, 2015 · 39 posts
wolf359 posted Mon, 06 April 2015 at 10:21 AM
Hi the key Phrase in all of your examples is this:
" The combinations you come up with don't make it innovative or unique or worthy of protection."
the question of weather something is "unique or worthy of protection"
Speaks to the very heart this concept in western civilization
called:"Intellectual property"
Sometimes the answer to this question is clearcut & fairly obvious to even the casual
layperson and many times it is a matter decided by the SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS of judges&juries
See the recent lawsuit over the Robin thicke/Ferell vs.the Marvin Gaye estate.
BTW. the latin term " reductio ad absurdum"
is the logical Fallacy of reducing your opponents argument to ridiculous proportions and criticizing that highly unlikely result.