I did not yet purchase the figure but from the material presented I must say I agree with most of the criticism.

The breasts default shape would go for 'supported' by sports bra and otherwise I assume they are morphable. The thigh side movement seems more like rigged for 'second skin'. Could be a design choice, I do not know. Too bad about the non-symetry.

Just one question though: Is the zero pose an 'A' pose? If so that would be a definite '+' point for me. Marvelous Designer interfacing would be so much easier.  MD uses patterns 'as cut' in real life, UV's are flat and un-distorted. The 'A' pose has definite advantages there when you are making items to conform the upper body. Poser's automatic grouping does not work well for this pose so this has to be done elsewhere, but otherwise a well supported figure in 'A' pose when zeroed could be an addition.
Nanette you own MD also and I take it you went down the MD->Poser conformer path for her. Am I right she is 'A' pose? What are your findings?

Fverbaas, I didn't use Marvelous Designer to make the clothing - I am so Blenderised now, I didn't even think of using it. As to the pose - her zero pose is a kind of A-pose,  but the arms are slightly bent and forward, and there is a lot of curvature in the back. The pose she loads up in, is not the zero pose. You need to explicitly zero this figure.

Poser 11 Pro, Windows 10

Auxiliary Apps: Blender 2.79, Vue Complete 2016, Genetica 4 Pro, Gliftex 11 Pro, CorelDraw Suite X6, Comic Life 2, Project Dogwaffle Howler 8, Stitch Witch