MistyLaraCarrara opened this issue on Jun 03, 2015 · 355 posts
Razor42 posted Fri, 12 June 2015 at 9:56 AM
lol glitterati you play the victim so well. DAZ didn't make any decision but to continue to innovate and add functionality to its platform. vendors make the decision whether to support Poser or not. Noone forces any sweeping decision. There is no anti poser conspiracy just free will of individuals to support the program of their own choosing. And you have done more than your fair share of belittling others for just expressing opinion.
Ask yourself why is it that the voices of a few Daz users in a Poser forum, here in poser heartland seem so loud? Two people arguing in a crowd can barely be heard. But in an empty hallway?
Also Hornet it's not prediction to look at current trends, genesis was released almost 5 years ago. Why is it that 5 years on SM have not been able to add some coding to Poser to give better support to DSON?
At false1 poser supports plenty of formats other than posers own. Obj, jpg, png just to name a few. Why is it the content developers that need to bare the burden of making square pegs fit posers round hole. When smith micro could implement changes to increase poser compatibility base and make the crossover much easier. Though as glitterati agreed its worth giving DS a long hard look if smith micro feel the way forward is locking out its users to a large portion of the content on the market.