Winterclaw opened this issue on Jul 21, 2015 ยท 146 posts
Zev0 posted Thu, 23 July 2015 at 1:21 PM
Lol don't come get angry with me just because I pointed out flaws with your idea. Ok let's create a scenario. Say Rendo releases this new Poser only figure. Now, how will it get content developers to create content for it? Why should they develop for it? What guarantees are there that revenue for it will be better than what they are supporting right now? Content developers have seen way too many new figures come and go and supporting them was a financial flop. So, how do you convince them that this figure is one they must support? Does the developer have any credibility in this regard? Do you have a plan in action for that? It's all nice wanting to create a new figure, but without the correct support structures, it will fail hard. Period. So, what support structures do you recommend that hasn't been tried before?
And FYI, A new Poser only figure is very niche market. It will only cater for those with app versions that support WM, unless you want it using old tech. Look at V4. Why is it successful? Because it can be used in nearly all versions of Poser and Daz. That is a huge user base. So why would content for a niche figure with a smaller market appeal be a viable decision regarding content support? Does that make any sense? You people come up with these ideas without thinking through it properly and get upset when people point out why it didn't work when it failed. Before creating a figure, look at the market, who can use actually use it, look what it is up against, then decide if its worth the effort.