Winterclaw opened this issue on Jul 21, 2015 · 146 posts
wolf359 posted Wed, 29 July 2015 at 3:42 PM
"A lot of really skilled people worked on Antonia; ODF, Diogenes, LesBentley, Cage, Bagginsbill, and the list goes on. Considering it was a free, community effort figure I don't see why you would need to denigrate the work of those folks."
The community largely rejected the END RESULT of the work of those talented folks
To point out that the Microsoft "Zune" was an Epic Failure is not a value judgement of the MS Engineers that did the skilled grunt work to develop it.
Also I was refering to the over blown hyperbole such as the gawdy, brobdingnagian
"They are coming" forum Banners as well as the, frankly silly"Mission Statement"
at "poser place"
"Oh, and you forgot to mention your "pipeline". Lol."
Not relevant but since you brought it up
My main reason for My Deleting "Antonia"
Almost immediately had nothing to do with her
overall looks or Attractiveness.
As an animator I need figures that use Standard Bone naming and rotational conventions for the purpose of motion retargeting.
This allows me to Create one Complex animation in Iclone or Endorphin
for Daz Mike4 or vicky 4.
and later re-use it on V3,V2,P6 Jessi & James,Miki 2 Daz Genesis 1 & 2
(with minor tweaks of course)
Antonia's Exotic"wave of the Future"
rigging precluded her from accepting any of my huge library of Motion data.
Making her useless to my .......Pipeline :-)