Strange wording for a TOS:

"Flame Baiting. It can be a person unfamiliar with a certain topic/discussion on an internet forum group, saying things that would provoke an angry, teasing, or overall negative response. For example: You’re a loser if you think Poser is better than Daz. OR Everyone knows which software will be at the top next time this year and it won’t be Poser/Daz. [These will purposely provoke negative reactions.]"

I think you mean familiar. How can you purposely provoke negative reactions if you're unfamiliar with a topic? Is being unfamiliar with a certain topic a violation of the TOS? Surely the opposite is true - the problem occurs when someone knows that a topic is contentious, but posts about it anyway.

UNFAMILIAR HAS BEEN REPLACED WITH "FAMILIAR"