MistyLaraCarrara opened this issue on Oct 04, 2015 ยท 94 posts
EldritchCellar posted Sun, 04 October 2015 at 3:07 PM
Nope. Although I used to draw pornographic comics years ago... before Poser. I don't really see the point, there's already enough real porn for everybody. But then I don't get photorealism either, even from a painting perspective. I can kinda get it with cg, where the technology is aiming for emulation of real world phenomena, but from an art perspective? Ok, it looks exactly like a photograph. One can hope that the photo says something more than the thing itself. Anyway, problem is... with pornography, after you have an orgasm what use does it have? Similar to watching someone eat or defecate, wow fascinating. I suppose there's some vicarious thrill of putting Barbie and Ken in naughty positions? Really, kinda pathetic. Does anyone consider real world producers of pornography to be creating meaningful or interesting works of art on any level other than point A point B? But, maybe I'm wrongly applying the incorrect term art when considering porn. I think that works that meditate on desire or beauty are great, porn's just for wacking off. Just some thoughts.
W10 Pro, HP Envy X360 Laptop, Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel UHD, 16 GB DDR4-2400 SDRAM, 1 TB PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD
Mudbox 2022, Adobe PS CC, Poser Pro 11.3, Blender 2.9, Wings3D 2.2.5
My Freestuff and Gallery at ShareCG