Gotta admit, I thought that "No naked women in Playboy from now on" story was another internet hoax or an article from the Onion that the regular news stations had picked up on -- hey it's happened before. Then I went to their site and yep, it's true. Nothing more explicit than you'd see in a Victoria's Secret catalog maybe come February 2016. I guess they decided since the internet really is for porn after all, and free porn at that, it was time to try something else. Wonder if they realize the internet, not to mention TV and magazines and catalogs and Poser too is full of scantily clad females? So if they want to stay in business as a magazine, it's gonna have to be on the basis of their articles. And sell clothing and whatever else they can slap a Bunny logo on.

I own a few issues myself, special celebrity editions with the old movie stars in them. And yes, I did read the articles. All in all, pretty good. But then again, I am not a heterosexual male, so I really can't speak for anyone in that category who claims "It's only for the articles!" when the mother, wife or significant other discovers his stash. I do, however, take such claims with a honkin' big heap of salt.