The bad thing about the trend, is that I feel the people monitoring the thread at that other site are directly involved with the development of Pauline. So rather than considering feedback in a reasonable manner. They are protecting their baby so to speak. Any criticism about the figure becomes that much more personal and they act personally to protect themselves and their baby. There is a bit of a disinformation meme going about that says 'people saying bad things are what makes these things fail'. In my experience the market is not so easily swayed by individual opinions and are generally smart enough to make their own assessment of the viability of a product. To stifle any criticism is basically restricting Pauline to a user group project rather than a competitive professional figure offering. Also on a more general note I haven't seen any real effort by SM to solve some of the big issues like version fragmentation of its user base, which may become one of the major issues facing Paulines adoption rate.