I'm a bit disappointed in Superfly. Ok, maybe it's my own fault. I thought the whole point of Superfly was that you could take your Poser/Firefly node set ups and render them in Superfly. No messing around, no having to spend a load of money on shaders and lights and whatever else. So, I've take both extremely simple scenes with extermely simple node set ups into both render engines as well and highly complex scenes with miles of shaders wired together. The simple scenes don't look any different. SF or FF, they look the same. Maybe reflections look a little better in SF but that's about it. The complex scenes render as expected in FF but if I try rendering them in SF, Poser crashes to the desktop.

I've also read in various threads that SuperFly is really not Cycles. If it isn't Cycles, where does it differ from Cycles? If you use a Cycles material set up in SF, will it render the same?

Should we be using different material set ups for SF than we use in FF?