it seems to me that a certain kind of feedback is essential to growth in anything. how can things be improved if the only views that are offered up are only those that will be perceived as purely positive? logic tells me that to come at things from that perspective could mean working out true issues takes far longer than necessary because issues were not met head on or directly. in that interim, more of the community walks away...

hopefully everyone will find an eventual, realistic balance :))

quick question:

"You may disagree with members, but if it’s in a vicious manner, it will not be acceptable..."

it seems to me to be pretty straightforward a thing, that sentence above, and surely we are all adult enough to be able to determine exactly what the word 'vicious' is, and can tell whenst a comment/post is intended as such.... but what if certain people are just way too overly sensitive and cannot tell the difference betwixt constructively intended words vs. true venom? what then?