Might want to rethink that last comment Hope. I'm related to her and I know what her previous issues were.

The last time she had her store closed for disagreeing with some aspects of prime. Her concerns on that were exactly what the store later said was the problem. She did so in a private forum back then as her warning yesterday stated she was supposed to do. She was never ever warned that time, nor was she banned they just closed her store without warning for pointing out that if they did prime as planned it was going to be a problem in a few years. She was brought back by previous administration who agreed she should never have had her store closed in the first place. It wasn't a case of previously breaking the rules when the later admin agreed she didn't do so. The only other time she has ever been warned since 2001 was again in a private forum when a vendor was bashing vendors that were not top sellers and she commented that the vendor in question had infringed copyrights in the past. She was banned from the vendor forum for that and closed her own store. She did not attack that vendor and she only pointed out a truth that had been in the copyright forum and did so only because he was attacking other vendors. So to claim she has a history of breaking the rules is actually not fully accurate and being used to distract from the real problem here.

Her 2nd post that you take as a personal attack was simply to address your statement of being an authority and your statement about experience over age concerning the fb page you are in charge of. She posted it before she got any warning and that can be shown with the records for the site. she posted and then saw the sitemail icon. read it and deleted the post so as not to go against the warning.

I know that she has stressed and pushed for changes to renderosity that would be positive and offered ideas that were used by the store. She was passionite about this store succeeding but lately she has been frustrated and fed up by the lack of real positive change. I see it with her all the time, her frustration. I talked to her about her choice when she decided to stay exclusive here even though her husband and friends wanted her to go back to daz. I told her to go to daz myself but she wanted this site to get better and felt that if she left she would just be adding to the problem. She emails and calls privately to talk about issues, I have personally heard her on the phone with staff. So that tells me that the truth of your statement is that vendors can never speak about issues in public when ignored in private and by banning her and closing her store you are trying to control other unhappy vendors.

i know she stated this site didn't need a cheerleader but she actually was one. I've seen her try to convince vendors that have left that they should keep trying here she has talked to me about her frustration that good vendors are leaving. I am glad you did this to her!!!! now she will not have to worry about it anymore and she can either retire as she was planing or go where there is no drama.