Thanks BB, I have HDR that are physically accurate with dynamics of 28EV stops , you don't find it on the market often and they render fantastic with light and shadows in any program that use unbiased rendering, so for this subject I am ready :)

bagginsbill posted at 9:18AM Tue, 01 March 2016 - #4258016

Sharp shadows from an HDRI require that the image is made to accurately encode the intensity of the sun. Many images I test do not. In fact, most do not. We blame the renderer or the means by which we include the HDRI, but the real culprit is that the HDRI is not physically accurate.

I wrote a long thread showing how to tell if your image is really HIGH dynamic range or just slightly better than JPEG. it has to do with how many f-stops were used in bracketing the photo. Most were only taken with 5 stops dynamic range (32 to 1) which means it's not even close to carrying the total energy that was actually there in the world around the camera.

I have found that boosting the luminance from the sun spot in the image is a way to compensate and get it to produce the correct illumination as a sole light source. However, SuperFly (being a straight path tracer) is not good at finding this hot spot. It takes a very large number of samples to accumulate or integrate the light correctly. It's much simpler to just using a matching infinite light, as is done with most of the sIBL sets.

_________________________________________________________

"Surrender to what it is - Let go of what was - Have faith in what will be "