vagabondallen opened this issue on Feb 25, 2016 ยท 158 posts
wolf359 posted Thu, 10 March 2016 at 10:24 AM
"I say we all should just make our own figures. Suited to whatever kind of art we wish to make. And who says we need to create just one?".... Poser is cursed with the burden of its instant gratification user base, market mentality which rewards the most conformity (see the desire for Genesis, and most of the art being T&A based generic sexdoll crap,"
The majority of the user base is not interested in any of the usual Nerdy Mcnerd techno babble about creating the ultimate figure that utilizes the latest capabilities of poser.
E.C.( quoted above) just stated clearly why this is the case
@ shvrdavid ..Sir what uniform standards ( yeah there I go again!!), did you apply in creating that "advanced pauline" and who will enforce them, and what version of poser is required to implement them??
You see the problem is bit larger than a fickle user base with genesis envy.
The problem is the business model of the poser application itself It cost money to have the latest version and many do not always upgrade in a prompt fashion.
It is therefore very diffcult to have a central authority (Like DAZ does) Dictatiing to ALL vendors a set of basic uniform standards regarding rigging and content compatibility that will be supported by the host application.
This is the core reason why antonia FAILED this why Project E will ultimately FAIL and scarlet and Dawn etc etc etc..
Just do a cursery study of how important UNIFORM STANDARDS are in other industries that rely on external content for their various delivery platforms.