EClark1894 posted at 5:29PM Mon, 07 November 2016 - #4289249

Male_M3dia posted at 3:20PM Mon, 07 November 2016 - #4289246

EClark1894 posted at 3:02PM Mon, 07 November 2016 - #4289244

You were the one who brought up what the vendors said they wanted, Terence. If you didn't already know, why bring it up?

No, I said vendor s aren't the blame for the subject of this thread. Stay on topic please. Besides taking a hostile attitude is not going to bring a solution to the OP's question either. If you want to know what they want, ask them for a change rather than blame them.

I am on topic. Here's the quote: "SM hasn't listened to any of their concerns or requests, taking the opinion of those that don't sell over those that do.. so if they find a company won't listen to them well they'll go to someone that actually has."

And I'm not hostile at all.

That was ;)

Seriously that's what those vendors said. They didn't specify and I didn't press them as I'm not the one that needs to know. But the way this conversation headed is typical of how this discussion usually goes. Posts about blaming the vendors and rather than finding out what the issue is at the source people want to argue. That's not how you're going to get them back.

You got poser vendors making products for other software and a thread just last week about one closing their store here and starting to look at that software as well. You'd probably need to seriously asking yourself why that is. Those vendors aren't going to publicly state those issues with regular customers reading (we see how those convos go here), that's the private convo SM needs to find out if they care about the content made for their software.