EClark1894 opened this issue on Dec 25, 2016 ยท 41 posts
A_Sunbeam posted Sun, 08 January 2017 at 3:36 AM
Charles has suggested he might be George VII - but I can't see why he shouldn't just be Charles III. After all, Prince George is more entitled to be George VII when he gets there. George VI's name was actually Albert (after the Prince Consort) but there was no tradition of King Alberts in England.