"Maybe the problem lies in the fact that the real dina:..." Actually, not for me it isn't. Personally, the 'real' Dina is pretty attractive in some of her layouts - though I suspect she is losing amore and more of her tone as time goes on because in some of them she is kinda - fleshy and in others she is a hardbody. In either case, the model in 3D doesn't seem to have much of the detail that Dina herself has. I am thinking more and more that it is the scnaner itself that messed this up. Then the rather agressive (to be polite) marketing and optimistic (to be very polite) "fact" comparisons have brought a lot of attention to the claims. Can the model be helped with morphs? Sure! At this point it would need morphs to look like Dina herslef... but that can all be fixed. The real questions is - when we are done morphing her what was the point fo the scanner int he first place? Anyway - it was a great idea and a cool hack. I agree with the poster above that it was probably a bad choice to leave the choice of the model up to the scanning company. The results changed what might have een a triumph into a long hard battle.