EClark1894 opened this issue on Nov 16, 2019 ยท 12 posts
Snarlygribbly posted Sat, 16 November 2019 at 4:08 PM
EClark1894 posted at 10:03PM Sat, 16 November 2019 - #4370393
No offense, Snarly, but based on that argument, there'd be no reason to ever improve the Material Room. Poser's Material room nodes stay full size, so you can't just lay them out and connect the nodes as needed. That's what zooming in and out would provide. I don't mind using the compound nodes to make things nice and neat, and I'd like to do e able to do that.
PS: Your arguement does hold water in the level of difficulty and length of time. Maybe there's some way to shrink down the node size?
That's nonsense, Earl. I'm sure the developers will give the Material Room some love when they get around to it, because they'll be paid for their efforts and it will benefit all Poser users. But you specifically said about doing it in Python, which means some poor sod giving up a chunk of their life to make it. Tell you what, I'll build a zoomable one for you, for $3,000, which is about what it would be worth for me to give up that much time. Let me know?
Free stuff @ https://poser.cobrablade.net/