wolf359 posted at 8:39AM Tue, 31 December 2019 - #4375071

@Movida First under Western tort law, class action lawsuits are to provide compensation to a legally defined "class" of otherwise disparate groups of victims who can ALL prove they have been materially harmed by the direct actions or even legally negligent inactions of the allged defendant/s

Have fun proving( in a real court of law ) that you ,and those like you ,are being materially harmed by your inability to afford or your emotional, philosophical opposition the monthly cost of Autodesk Maya or Adobe photoshop.

Nobody was given a choice. The initiation of subscription models enables forcing users to pay for future improvements they might neither want nor need. Way to go free enterprise.

And I have observed that the only people banging on on about the Closed nature of the Daz HD morphs are the people who lack the skills to become a Daz PA (and gain access),

Or people who do not even use the Daz Studio software but somehow believe Access to its proprietary features are some sort of fundamental "civil right".

You can just accuse me of not being skilled, you don't have to beat around the bush about it. Speak right up. I don't care what you think and the day is young. My position is that once these software companies secure a monthly income flow they proceed to kick segments of their user base to the curb (a revealing development don't you think? ) and proceed to put the screws to those left, who have NO CHOICE but to comply whether or not they need the touted upgrades. Also, the phone homes gather information on the user...what exactly are they gathering and what are they doing with it? I don't intend to continue on with this because you are always right...no matter what and your ad hominums are rather tiring.

Where are the big class action lawsuits on behalf of the oppressed underclass who were denied watching HBO's Game of thrones", CBS's "Startrek Discovery" ,Disney's "the Mandalorian" or Amazons "The Expanse season4"

Apples and oranges.