Azath

You still haven't said how users have been disadvantaged, and I'm really glad you were part of the negotiations and know what was on offer. SM owned the product and clearly wanted rid asap. As to the legal situation, well as far as I'm aware the only commitment to keeping poser running was a statement by Nerd on a website. And we know the law is only defined by legislation and the courts. How many poser users could have taken SM to court? The legal costs compared to what they might gain would seem to make this an unwise idea. Trying to organise some sort of class action when the best they could hope to get was the price they paid for poser back? Good luck with that one

And thank you for letting us know that companies are in business for themselves. This applies to every business in the free world. Ford and General Motors are not in the business of building cars, they are in the business of making money

So since you haven't been able to say why it has been bad for me, I'll just make up my own mind based on reality, not paranoid fantasies.