wolf359 posted at 10:25AM Tue, 11 February 2020 - #4379746

You built an "Original Silo Mesh" then transferred the Genesis rigging to that new figure and wanted to distribute it as a new Open Source asset. The Mesh is possibly derivative depending on how you created it. The rig is 100% derivative of Daz 3D owned >and copyrighted content

Wrong.. I tried to give away the empty, hollow NON rigged original Silo mesh ,you see in the pictures, to help others make their own FREE clothing

Daz said no.?

Because MY MESH was pulled with C4D magnet tools to loosely enclose a daz figure shape it becomes subject to their EULA

Razor42 the link you posted is about a Daz studio transfer utility rigged mesh and I conceded that the daz RIGGING should be controled by them ?

Daz considers any static NON RIGGED mesh pushed scaled or pulled to fit around any portion of a genesis mesh (even a torus primitive scaled to fit a wedding ring finger)

to be a "derivative' of their figures "unique shape"

@ the OP do not listen to us third parties!! ?

Ask daz themselves and they will confirm what I have stated regarding ORIGINAL MESHES THAT ENCLOSE THEIR FIGURES Shape.

So you are saying that it was a mesh shape made using a Genesis figure as a shape guide, to allow the easier creation of clothes for Genesis. But you feel that it is in no way to be considered as to be derivative of the Genesis mesh or figure? Honestly, the terms of use and even for distribution of derivative content are covered in the Daz 3D EULA. And again DAZ 3D gains no ownership of even derivative content, they have the same controls as practically every similar business in the market. Let me ask if Daz asked you to release the item in their store and you rolled your eyes at them and declined, why should they allow the release of what they consider to be derivative content elsewhere? Tell me would Reallusion do the same? Would most businesses do the same?