EClark1894 opened this issue on Mar 09, 2020 ยท 125 posts
wolf359 posted Mon, 16 March 2020 at 9:08 AM
Letterworks posted at 9:07AM Mon, 16 March 2020 - #4383646
At this point reading this thread it seems any effort i make now or in the future is useless. I don't really think I could ever make a living at this but it would be nice to offset the cost of the software needed, but it seems to me reading this that everyone is settled and happy with the status quo to the point that noting new for Poser is worth the effort involved in it's creation.
Am I true in this belief? would it be better just to let Poser content die out to the point where only approximately 15 year old figures are available to use in 10-15 year old technology? And that everything needed for those old figures and old technology has already been made so any attempt to add to it is useless?
Please let me know if what I am reading this correctly so I can move along now and now waste any more time effort and yes, money on this area of 3D.
My family will thank you
If your core program has been slow to innovate then the content created for it. will stagnate as well.
What are the major new features in poser 11 that would be considered paradigm shifting in terms of making the program more attractive to vendors as a content development platform. ?.
When you see people saying that they are using this or that 12+ year old figure that indicates that the core program has not truly innovated in more than a Decade or the old content would not be compatible ,in any worthwhile fashion with the most recent features of the program.
And crowdsourcing figure development only leads to LESS UNIFORM STANDARDS for any potential new vendors to follow as the one person who made their own exotic figure is the single point of failure and when they leave,die ,quit the figure typically dies with them.?