ockham posted at 5:05AM Fri, 17 July 2020 - #4394643

Rejection and editing are always painful, but ShareCG is in business to make money. They know what their customers like, and they don't want to put an item in the 'display window' that will drive away their customers. They're exerting Quality Control, as all publishers do.

Objectively speaking, they haven't jailed you or fined you or even demonetized you. They've simply given you a useful piece of information. Now you know what the audience likes, and you can exert your own Quality Control accordingly. You can either find another outlet for your art, or adjust your art to fit the desires of the ShareCG audience.

You make many true and valid points Ockham, I agree with most of it. There's one little flaw in the logic though... the OTHER highly rated things in my gallery there. I can provide many examples but here's one that's very obvious. Why is this acceptable and the other is not?

I have other well received examples of a similar vein, it's a little difficult to exert an adjustment to what art I submit when a control isn't used in the study to proceed from. There's more to it. As in whoever complained simply had a grudge, after all the image wasn't actually removed for TOS violation it was removed because of the opinion of a few squeaky wheels...

---

W10 Pro, HP Envy X360 Laptop, Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel UHD, 16 GB DDR4-2400 SDRAM, 1 TB PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD

Mudbox 2022, Adobe PS CC, Poser Pro 11.3, Blender 2.9, Wings3D 2.2.5

My Freestuff and Gallery at ShareCG