I don't think so. Maybe? I kind of got my morph conventions from morphs ++ conventions... probably like most people have really. The numbering I just use because it seems the most immediate, takes up less space. I figure the user will figure it out or I'll make notations in the readme/documentation. The things I'm making for La Femme will need some explanation for sure. There's morphs that only work correctly with other particular morphs as a pre-requisite, that sort of thing. I've taken to using matching asterisk multiples. Morph parameter custom groups are helpful too.

For shaping stuff that's more self explanatory I use ADJ and Fix.