Thanks everyone for your support and feedback!

adp001 posted at 5:36 AM Fri, 30 September 2022 -#4445549

Thanks!

Problem with posting links?

No, it's just that officially we're not supposed to post direct links, although I can't recall ever seeing it enforced.

primorge posted at 6:23 AM Fri, 30 September 2022 - #4445551

Here's hoping future versions don't break morphs but I understand the reasoning. And I see the warning in the ReadMe about future updates changing things.

Future morph breakage is unlikely. I've fixed all the things in the mesh that have been bugging me. Further improvements are certainly possible, but I think if I really caught a desire to create the "perfect" mesh at some point, it would make more sense to create a new figure from scratch.

Changes in grouping could of course also break meshes, and there are some I've considered and might experiment with. But I can't see the advantages being large enough to justify breaking things.

The third possibility I can see is a modified base shape. I don't like her current default genital area much and once I have a few morphs for that, might pick one to be the new default. But since that wouldn't change vertex orders and such, any morphs affected should be easy to fix.

What I was thinking of mostly when I wrote that in the ReadMe where changes in the rigging that could affect poses and conforming clothes to some degree. But well, no guarantees...

-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.