vopehov506 posted at 11:31 AM Wed, 19 April 2023 - #4462749

Will have a look at what is going on might just be that the stuff is rather old that I loaded for this animation. So the Firefly renders ended to be 4min vs 1h19 min Superfly consumption of the CPU was less then 100Watts on firefly and around 180Watts on superfly low setting. It is quiet a difference, and if you tell me that your render took about 55 sec then were there.

No. We are NOT there.The render that took 55 seconds was largely due to the multiple layers of hair transparency that took up a good part of the scene. The scene that you are trying to render doesn't have transparent hair layers as far as I can see. It is NOT an apples to apples comparison.  You are just looking for any reason you can to justify that SuperFly doesn't work.

And if you are not using your GPU card on your own scene, that isn't POSER'S fault.  You are using the CPU render time as an excuse for why Superfly renders are slower than Firefly.

Now all depends on the quality you wish having and also depending on the style of renders, for me superfly and Firefly do not make such a big quality difference they are just different.

And yet, you are comparing a high quality FireFly render to a low quality SuperFly render because you don't want to use your GPU rendering with Optix.

You can get as nice renders with Firefly as you can get with Superfly a matter of taste, to get best results both will end up into a Post-working app to really be final. For me Firefly is good enough it will save allot of time and be less heavy on the computer.

That is your choice. But because you have refused to listen to ways that you can render much faster in SuperFly, I maintain that your main objective here is to troll. It's best at this point that I put your posts back on ignore. Your mind is made up, and no amount of trying to help is going to change that. All of the suggestions people have given you in all your threads are just falling on deaf ears.