A direct copy and pasted quote from the moderator
in the lightwave /forum gallery:
("It is now within the power of the moderator to move images from one gallery to another. While this may be to the dismay of some, it is also to the gratitude of many. I moderate the Lightwave Gallery and there are many images that do not belong there and should be moved to other places. I am sure many of you will agree. As a personal rule, I will tell you the criteria for having an image moved.
1st. I don't care if it is rendered in Lightwave or not. If you have a poser model as the focal point or the majority of your image was done in bryce and simply had a little work done in Lightwave, then that image is being moved. The galleries are separated not for reasons of dominance of aristocracy, but so that users of that particular software can see what content is being created with it. Lightwave is a modelling and animation package. Lightwave users may use it for one or the other or even both, however to simply dump a poser model into Lightwave and render it ain't gonna cut it in the lightwave gallery. That is is the law gentlmen and ladies. If you don't like it, you know how to IM me.")

NOT trying to instigate here but thats the new rule over there its not a "vicious Rumor"

I agree with his standard for the lightwave gallery
but its just not practical to have such a standard for the bryce gallery.
because then we are left with mountain ranges and shimmer planes of water like those poor terragen users(and trees for us version5 owners)
lets be honest terrain modeling is very limited
and the best bryce renders i have done has been with
imported meshes.

My website

YouTube Channel