Well, love this question, cause women are such beautiful creatures :) Personally I think that porn(ografy) shows women the way the average guy would like them to be. With the 'average guy' I mean the kind of person who got married because he doesn't earn enough to afford a real butler. Since the only function of the photos is to satisfy people's sexual needs nobody would be interested in the quality of the photos....well, other than how Other than the money, I can't think of any reason why a women would want to do stuff like this. I don't mean to say that I'm some kind of saint, but I really think that it's boring and in no possible way could be a subsitute for the excitement and fun of real life (and it's just skips the most fun part of all, seducing ;) Well, the biggest problem with it for me is that women are much, much more charming, intelligent, gracious and compelling than men could ever possibly be, but porn(ografy) doesn't show anything of that.....it just doesn't show any respect to women at all. And perhaps that's the difference with Rubens or Gaugin.... And about that 2nd photo: If she feels happy walking around like that, I'd be the last one to tell her not to. But I don't feel anything when I look at that. Clothes, stockings, high heel shoes....it's just a pile of cotton and leather....or if you like 'plants and dead cows'. No, if I walk some where and this girl looks at me in particular way, just her eyes can just keep me awake for nights. But maybe I'm just an old fashioned fool :)