Okay, I want yone to jump up and scream the word PENIS. Ok, now I want you all to scream out the word VAGINA. U know, these are parts of our body. They are there, and we can attempt to hide them all we want, but they will always be there (barring some unforeseen pineapple accdent, but I won't get into that now...). The breast is essentially fatty tissue. They are also blatantly there, and no matter how much clothing there is covering them up, they are there. a woman Wearing a super tight t-shirt i find much more appealing than the same woman walking naked down the street, likely because I get to imagine what's there. Should that mean that women wearing clothing should be taboo, because me (and likely many other men) find it almost more eye catching than someone baring all? I find there are differences between art and porn. If you want porn, you go to the video store and rent it. There is a HHHUGE difference betwwen what's on your television,, and the Venus Demilo (typo), though both (most of the time) are/have naken women. The galleries are much in debate always over this. Porn is also something that the canadian government has never been able to give a complete and definite definition of, so its mostly p for public debate. Sex scenes in what are considered igh art films can easily be mistaken for porno, simply because its up to the person to make their own decision on the matter. To me, porn must involve the following to be porn. 1- Naked people engaging in sexual acts. Nudity is not required, always though. 2- A very small budget. 3- a poorly written and often hilarious story and plot. 4- a dirty old man in the corner of the room doing nothing but lick his lips while watching. I might call other things porn, but I'll be making up my rules along the way just like everyone else. As for the girl in the photo, you haven't seen nothing yet until you come to montreal for a few days. We are contantly called the sex capital of north america.