Yes, they can create kiddie porn with third-party props, but that perfectly absolves DAZ from any legal challenges arising from the results, no? Actually, probably not, because if the company that provided the "additional tools" needed got caught in the suit, DAZ probably would be as well. I honestly doubt either company would be hit with anything that got created by a pedophile for the purposes of cyber-porn. That's about like saying Ford is responsible when a driver runs a red light and kills a family of five. I'm sure DAZ is trying to just protect us all, but, as lmc says above, it's really getting pretty ridiculous. We might as well return to the days when Sears airbrushed all of its mens underwear photos so as not to offend anyone..... =)