Reports suggest that Bryce is more stable than Vue; I haven't enough experience with Vue to comment. I would say that Vue is probably better for landscape scenes, but Bryce is better for interiors. With Bryce it is easier to get fine control over placing and details. For example, constructing a room out of box primitives is much easier. Also, once you have got used to the Bryce interface, and learnt the tricks of the trade, you can work more efficiently than you can with Vue. The Poser import is a plus for Vue, BUT it does mean you must do all or most of your texturing in Poser. Once you get the hang of Bryce's materials editor you can do lots of nice things which you can't do in Poser and can't do so easily in Vue. Note: Poser to Bryce is much easier when you use the Grouper pre-processing program (see previous threads on the topic). The programs have different strengths, and it really depends on what sort of pictures you want to do most.