carlosmanuel opened this issue on Mar 15, 2002 ยท 45 posts
pj-bear posted Fri, 15 March 2002 at 3:08 PM
Oh yeah Khepricaun. It makes complete sense as a means to an artistic end. But I think we agree that for many of us genitals are not the same as porn. They are just proper parts of the anatomy. One does not even have to be talking about fine nudes in my opinion, to justify leaving the genitals intact. A naked, wrinkled, bent, old woman or man would also look even more disfigured to me if the genitalia were removed. Frankly it would not look like serious art if something were removed that would normally be seen in a given pose. Of course if you are going to cover with clothing ultimately, then that is another issue.