With fairies that are based on the Millenium girls, we got problems. What is mildly eroticised? For some people ANY nudity is eroticised-- I think, they have a problem since art is, and has been for 9000 yrs, centered around nudes. But they also have a voice. This is a very very subjective area. I, for one, would like specific rules. I'm going to be working with fairies soon. Just bought Ziza. I don't want to be slammed for something I didn't know was wrong. For instance, is the Conforming Ivy prop out of bounds? Are convenient flowers, on an otherwise naked body, out of bounds-?- I'm speaking of a figure based on the Mil PreTeen figure, I don't consider faeries built on standard Victoria to be other than adult. And I'm not talking about sexual situations that involve touching, just nudity or the impression of nudity-- since that seems to be the same thing in the galleries now. And, is nudity on a preteen fairy, out of bounds period? No matter how innocent it appears? It doesn't matter that I don't think it should be out of bounds, I'll live with whatever rules are set up-- my real concern is that the rules are clear and easy to understand. Emily