Like voodoo, I don't like the idea of categories and ratings, much. For instance, one of the things that got me interested in this idea to begin with is that I wanted a place to post my images where I could get some idea of the emotional impact of the piece, while remaining aloof from critiques of technical prowess. On the same note, I understand people who prefer it the other way around. If I wanted to know what impact a piece had on the viewer, them rating in various categories would be pretty arbitrary, and tell me very little. As for the standards, I don't think the forum should be as "tight" as other places. While I understand the need for strict interpretation in some forums, I could see it killing this one quick. I'd like to see it become a relaxed atmosphere, where if a critique seemed out of line, the mod was someone who could send an IM asking for a reword or delete from the person who posted. This would solve a lot of the problems with what many view as censorship. At the same time, if the member was unresponsive or took it personally, the mod would have to be willing to step on toes to keep wars from breaking out, and I respect that. Also, the mod should be able to spot other potential forms of abuse not incumbent in the ToS outright. I personally could foresee people trying to use this forum as a place to gain comments, views, and votes for their image that they did not necessarily warrant. I could also foresee several ways it could be used to sell products ( which is the domain of the Product Showcase ) and to start flamewars. Whatever mod got put in that position, would have to know their way around the membership pretty well, and have pretty good judgement. Ironbear comes to mind, for me, because of the things I've seen him do in C&D, which included a lot of times knowing when something was about to happen, and diffusing the situation with the people involved on a one-on-one basis. Of course, C&D wasn't always under control, but IMHO it would have been a thousand times worse without IB's abilities. Contrary to what Slynky thinks, I also think Micheleh would do well in the forum, if she could handle the extra work. I say this, because, contrary to popular belief, I think she has a good heart, and sharp wits. I think the OT forum has forced her to get seasoned quick. My only caution in that matter would be to her, to not let herself think that this forum could be handled the same way OT is. It just wouldn't work. OT's run the way it is because of the nature of the forum, whereas, to be as strict in this forum as is necessitated in that, would lead to so many more problems. The last thing I'll say on moderation is this: Whoever you pick, make sure that all the mod's have a good consensus from day one. The witnessed inconsistencies in TOS interpretation could be easily stopped, if the mod teams took the time to see past their differences, and act decisively. Basically, I know that the inconsistencies are because you are all different people, with different POVs, and when there's no one around to consult, each mod/admin must act on their judgement. All I'm saying is that, before the forum even opens, all the mods involved should find the time to sit and discuss any abuses and grey areas they should look for, and decide how the TEAM will deal with them if they occur. What's the old saying? "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cheese curd." Wait... that's not it.... Anyway, I'm done telling you guys how to do your job, I'm sure you're much better at it than I am... Just thought I'd speak my mind FWIW. Regards, Paul