arcady opened this issue on Apr 16, 2002 ยท 105 posts
VirtualSite posted Wed, 17 April 2002 at 11:24 AM
Sorry, but a bit of a rant here... What is it with you people? Okay, maybe this was a vague and somewhat misguided attempt, but does that mean we have to allow everything in some kind of virtual free-for-all? An image of little kids having sex, created solely as some kind of jerk-off material, is perfectly okay as long as they're not real? Are we looking at the next big growth industry here? I'm sorry, but that's ludicrous. You people seem more interested in your God-given right to show double-D hooters on little girls than anything else, and this kind of priority just amazes me. Not one of you has expressed even the slightest concern that maybe, just maybe, some version of this law could be a good thing. Instead, it's "wahoo! -- gimme them MilGirls and watch out!" I guess we can expect breast morphs for the pre-teens in Freestuff almost any hour now; I mean, isn't that what the Poser world needs more than anything else? Well, I guess I shouldn't be surprised at anything any more. Today I see the president of the LPGA, a man BTW, thinks the players should be more "sexy". Yeah, an all-swimsuit edition of the LPGA -- just what the world needs, right? Maybe strip-a-thons on the 18th hole as a means of breaking a tie. Gee, with any luck, maybe we'll also see a call for Chippendales to sponsor bowling. Hey, and maybe we could have nude professional football: maybe that would have saved the XFL. The world truly is going to frigging hell in a handbasket.