I've done a lot of thinking since my last foray into this discussion. I think looking at pictures of naked children for a sexual thrill is sick and wrong. But I think a lot of my disgust comes from the fact that for some weirdo to have the pics a child somewhere had to be abused and exploited. CG art doesn't harm a child in that way so I'm not sure how I feel about this development. Honestly I'm all for artistic freedom but this law does have me a bit worried. Not for the fact that someone might put big breast on a mil gir, thats uhm lame, but because someone out there may take it as a sign that its okay to look at a real child as a sex object.