VS:

Unless you are also TigerD, I will not be taking your word on what his intent was.

I am, to a much lesser extent, also offended that you would suggest that I and my fellow representatives of Renderotica should be the ones to apologise. It reminds me of the time that my daughters school principal made her apologise to the boy who punched her in the face and knocked her down because "she made him mad".
I, and my co-mods, have been given a virtual punch in the face, and I'll be damned if I'm going to apologise to the one who did it.

TigerD made the statement that I take offence to.
It is up to him to apologise for such a libelous remark, or clarify his statement if he meant something other than what is clearly impied. The implication, which is clear to me, is that he is stating that Renderotica allows sexual images involving children to be displayed in their galleries.

As a moderator at Renderotica, I do take great offence to that implication, and no, I will not move on until I am answered by the person responsible.