Forum: OT


Subject: Supreme Court approve CG-made child porn...

arcady opened this issue on Apr 16, 2002 ยท 105 posts


spinner posted Thu, 18 April 2002 at 1:22 PM

Wow. big thread. In a way, thank god for that, but you lost me somewhere after the Doctor piped up about personal responsibility ( a top for legibility: hit enter now and then, pretty please ? ) So let me just add my two cents here: One: Breats morphs for the MilKids ? Dears, the attraction is the LACK of breasts, not the existence of them on a child. The more innocent the child looks, the better. Two: Do you honestly think that CG will ever replace the real thing for a person of such inclinations ? They all profile pretty much alike, and in the end, it all comes down to urges, and being able to control them. If you can't , you do so willfully, and fuck the twinkie-type defences that have sprung up over the years. Also... excuse me for asking, but doesnt 'rotica have a no kids and no animals in their ToS ? ~S