{because until Congress says otherwise, it's now perfectly legal to make and distribute kid-porn made through CG means. And while you guys are bashing Tiger's writing style, no one seems interested in that simple little fact.} I guess you aren't comprehending what we are saying, VS. Not one of the people involved in the discussion over TigerD's post has come out in favor of child porn. In fact, we don't allow it on Renderotica. Period! Sorry, but we are understandingly upset with TigerD's implications. All that need be done here is for him to come here and state what he really meant, because gee, it seems that of the people discussing this, more people agree he WAS implicating that Renderotica allows child porn than the one person (you) who says he knows his writing style and that he wasn't. Nobody is saying they support child pornography. Not one person in this thread. However there are some who are saying that they don't support unclear laws. I guess the Supreme Court agrees. And Dmon, I fail to see how the image you are speaking of can in ANY way be construed as child porn. Faerie does not equal child. And this faerie doesn't even remotely look like a child.