Forum: OT


Subject: Supreme Court approve CG-made child porn...

arcady opened this issue on Apr 16, 2002 ยท 105 posts


Jack D. Kammerer posted Thu, 18 April 2002 at 4:25 PM

If it was my daughter VS, I would find the person who did it, cut their balls off and sow them into their mouth, the proudly set them on fire in the middle of a busy intersection, trust me, I've had 9 years to figure out what I would do if I caught the bastard... REGARDLESS of that feeling, a real child is completely different that one made up of polygons. The only person harmed in it is the person who is doing the stupid picture and the poor/stupid SOB that decides to view it. Who really gives a two bit shit if some sick and twisted demented pervert decides to create Michael throwing a hump into a Preteen? Sure, we could all sit here and sweat and worry that that sicko might go out and do it for real, or we all can actually buy a clue that no matter how many laws we bend and convolute to govern a person's state of mind. Am I celebrating that the law has been overturned? I didn't break out a bottle of bubbly and pass out cigars. Actually, I could give a rats ass if it passed or failed. I reconize that there need to be laws that can and WILL prevent the victimization of REAL (let me say it again for those who are unclear on the subject) REAL children. Busting people on the basis that their CG Art might arouse a Child Molestor, doesn't FIX the FUCKING PROBLEM. Like I said before, create a law that goes after the motherfuckers that are actually committing the REAL CRIME against REAL CHILDREN rather than sitting content with those who play with POSER KIDS. You may not like my opinion VS and face it, you aren't going to change it. You come back and offer me your opinion when you've been through the same shit as me... alright? Then maybe I will lend some serious thought to your "we need to protect the rights of 3D models that can be used to tease a pervert and turn them into a child molestor" opinion. Jack