Forum: OT


Subject: Supreme Court approve CG-made child porn...

arcady opened this issue on Apr 16, 2002 ยท 105 posts


VirtualSite posted Thu, 18 April 2002 at 7:16 PM

Whatever, folks. Trash Tiger all you want, if it makes you feel better. Play "I'm a bigger victim than you" if that makes you feel better. Bite your tongue till it bleeds and announce it to the world if you want. But never ever entertain the possibility that, gosh, you just might be wrong. Wow, what a concept. Oh, Momcat? That "interference"? It's called defending a friend. But nevertheless you still ain't got any law on the books right now that controls the manufacture and distribution of CG-made kiddie porn, and as the line between real and "real" gets fuzzier and fuzzier, it's gonna be harder and harder for you to prove that anything in those films was real to begin with, even if the "filmmaker" went to the outrageous expense of mocap and disguised it that way. Rotoscoping? Entirely within the realm of possibility, and you wouldn't need any kids, just an existing film of real kids. But it's still legal, right? Oh, one other thing: that whole "Romeo and Juliet" argument? If we're using the social order of another time and place as a barometer of the appropriateness of a certain law, then we might as well toss gender-bias ones out the window as well and return to the time when women knew their place. No? Well, gee, tell me the difference. This should be really entertaining.