arcady opened this issue on Apr 16, 2002 ยท 105 posts
arcady posted Fri, 19 April 2002 at 12:21 AM
" Excuse me people, but has anyone noticed the picture that is number one on Renderoticas top 10?" ************************************************************** Good god that's a disgusting image... I don't know what I think of that or where I'd put it, I think that ones going to huant me for a while though... that needs a serious warning on it before you click in... hmmm... ... Anyway; the points made by Jack about now requiring you find a victim are very good ones. In the thread above this one I also pointed out that before a few days ago legally any image of a minor in the buff was child porn, as was things like Romeo and Juliet. Anybody seen, read, or been in a Romeo and Juliet play, book, or movie? Before yesterday by the letter of the law you were a sex offender. That point was even made by the justices on the court. The law just had WAY TOO BROAD of a definition... It's not likely any sane judge or jury would convict you for going to see Romeo and Juliet; but legally they could have... Thankfully that loophole is closed now. I'm still wondering how this affects the TOS of various 3D sites. Ok so you don't plan to change your TOS; at least clarify it. Does a 'coppertone' pic or a fairy count as child porn? Before yesterday they both did...
Truth has no value without backing by unfounded belief.
Renderosity
Gallery