Just weighing in myself..... Yup, only one exact match, but the rest were within pretty tiny tolerances that would be damn difficult for someone to create independently. Sorry, Mikeknott, these are indeed one and the same. Any incredibly slight variations could easily be accounted to the simple act of copying the set, then copying it again and again -- like a photocopy, data does indeed degrade (however slightly) every time it's copied. And when we're looking at variations this small? Get real, bud. Sean